Cory Doctorow is up in arms about new shrink-wrap licenses that are coming with wood working tools in this post he says:
The vile, anti-customer shrink-wrap licenses that are universal in software have started showing up in hardware; particularly, jig-makers are requiring those who buy their templates to aver that they will not loan, sell or allow re-use of the templates they buy.
This is revolting: it comes down to the idea of expecting the world to pay your living, even though your business isn't sustainable. Copyright doesn't give you the right to restrict sale and lending of your works, but it does give you the power to shrink-wrap all of the copies of your work with a contract that claws back all of the public's rights in copyright, including the first sale right that enables reselling and so forth.
I agree with Cory much of the time, but here I just can't bring myself to do it. Yes, I agree that business need to adapt to new landscapes as their customers evolve, but this is a legitimate way of doing it. If the consumer really objects to the license then he won't buy the product.
This is exactly what happened to Intuit last year when they packaged strict anti-piracy code with turbotax. People complained and sales went down.
These practices are not anti-consumer, they are pro-business. It's not up to a business to look out for consumers, it's up to consumers to look out for themselves. Businesses will react based on sales. When people stop buying woodworking tools with shrink-wrap licenses as opposed to those without, then the licenses will go away.