Bruce Sterling is on Wired talking about the fact that problems are no longer localized to a single place. What we have today are really world problems, and our current infrastructure is not set up to handle these new problems. With the actions of recent administrations, and recent world events I think I am inclined to agree with Bruce on several of these issues.
He says:
We denizens of the early 21st century cling to a leftover notion that anything "global" is remote, abstract. That's no longer true. A global problem is everyone's problem, often in intimate ways. Chinese germs multiply in American bloodstreams. Colombian narcoterrorists maintain branch offices in every major US city. There's only one atmosphere, and no pulldown menu for selecting a new one.
Later on he talks about the fact that none of our institutions really work for maintaining order in our world, or even getting anything done. He shows that fundamentally the institutions we have set up today just can't work for the problems of the 21st century.
He says:
Four types of mechanisms exist to finesse the world's world-sized problems. Unfortunately, none of them are of much use.
Finally Bruce says there is a need for a New World Order, that he is calling the "Next World Order".
He says:
The New World Order, proclaimed in Gulf War I, died in Gulf War II. The Next World Order has means, motive, and opportunity now. Instead of the customary 20th-century hot air and phony baloney, it might turn out to be rather hands-on, tough-minded, and practical. There are good reasons to think this will happen, with or without American cooperation. The Next World Order may well look like nothing we previously were led to expect.
What I find interesting in this is that there must have been some very similar arguments made when the US was a fledgling country. If you look at the back of our one dollar bill you will see the words, "Novus Ordo Seclorum", which roughly translates to a "New Secular Order". I think it can be argued that the founding fathers felt the same way that Bruce does. They felt a new order was needed, and for a time they succeeded in their goal. But they didn't do it by creating something truly new. They just moved far away from everyone else, and that made things better. Today communication is bringing us all together again, and there are new cries for a new world order.
Yes, I'm sure people will point out that the US was one of the first modern democracies and that we have many freedoms guaranteed that others do not. These are not items to be taken lightly, but I think recent times have shown us that these things do not make the world a better place on their own. People will still act according to their base desires, and that includes the desire for the majority to oppress the minority.
I think what really led to the prosperity of the last few centuries in the US is the fact that we were isolated from the rest of the world geographically and informationally. That can't be said today, and we are starting to see the problems of too many people living in too small a space.
Maybe it's time to seriously look into colonizing the moon. I think we need more space again.